> "keep finding the optimal number for genome clusters at about 6, lining up exactly with 19th century categories"
I thought it was 5.
Also in the 19th century?
It's up to interpretation and the method if you you're really asking but yeah anywhere between 4 and 7.
undefined subscriptions will be displayed on your profile (edit)
Skip for now
For your security, we need to re-authenticate you.
Click the link we sent to , or click here to sign in.
> "keep finding the optimal number for genome clusters at about 6, lining up exactly with 19th century categories"
I thought it was 5.
Also in the 19th century?
It's up to interpretation and the method if you you're really asking but yeah anywhere between 4 and 7.