It's time for a national conversation about racist violence ... in the WNBA
Richard Hanania snarked about my post yesterday about the season-long campaign of racist violence by WNBA black players against white rookie Caitlin Clark.
Then, today, this just happened to Caitlin Clark at the forearm of loudmouthed rival Angel Reese:
Clark’s shot was already two feet past Reese’s hand when Reese hammered Clark in the head with her arm, knocking her to the floor. Reese was whistled for “unnecessary roughess” but not for “excessive roughness.”
If the races were reversed, this of course would be a huge on-going story, dwarfing, say, even the Central Park Karen of 2020.
But, of course, the New York Times treats the bigger story as Bad People noticing the racist violence against the white woman and objecting to it, when all Good People know that blacks can’t be racist because they have no power, such as in … the WNBA? … Anyway, that’s not the point, the point is 1619, which means that blacks get to abuse whites until 2619.
They're trying to hurt Clark. If she gets injured, the WNBA goes down in flames. But they're so insanely enabled that they don't realize this.
Caitlyn naively must assume it’s just them trying to knock her down a peg like talented rookies in the NBA.. I notice it’s envious, probably racist black lesbians committing flagrant fouls attempting to injure.