I know there is a popular blogger, podcaster, whatever who calls himself Cat Turd. I have never read, watched, listened, etc. to any of his content. Your attempts to connect me to him are a form of guilt by association and ad hominem argument, both of which are logical fallacies.
I have learned to distinguish between the data and findings…
I know there is a popular blogger, podcaster, whatever who calls himself Cat Turd. I have never read, watched, listened, etc. to any of his content. Your attempts to connect me to him are a form of guilt by association and ad hominem argument, both of which are logical fallacies.
I have learned to distinguish between the data and findings of studies and their recommendations, which are often influenced by outside forces. Also, a study penned in 2021 would not be informed by the still growing body of evidence concerning COVID vaccine harm. Like many other things in life, medications and vaccines should be evaluated on a risk/benefit basis. Because it was rushed to market, we are still learning about the risks while the rewards are diminishing because the virulence of COVID is diminishing. Yet the CDC is still recommending shots and boosters for populations with next to zero vulnerability to the disease.
I called you a cat turd because your arguments are on the same intellectual level as catturd. If it's lying on the ground looking like a cat turd and stinking up the place I'm gonna call it a cat turd.
"I have learned to distinguish between the data and findings of studies and their recommendations, which are often influenced by outside forces"
Nah, if you didn't data and findings of the study you'd just say we can't "trust" the "system" blah blah blah.
I know there is a popular blogger, podcaster, whatever who calls himself Cat Turd. I have never read, watched, listened, etc. to any of his content. Your attempts to connect me to him are a form of guilt by association and ad hominem argument, both of which are logical fallacies.
I have learned to distinguish between the data and findings of studies and their recommendations, which are often influenced by outside forces. Also, a study penned in 2021 would not be informed by the still growing body of evidence concerning COVID vaccine harm. Like many other things in life, medications and vaccines should be evaluated on a risk/benefit basis. Because it was rushed to market, we are still learning about the risks while the rewards are diminishing because the virulence of COVID is diminishing. Yet the CDC is still recommending shots and boosters for populations with next to zero vulnerability to the disease.
I called you a cat turd because your arguments are on the same intellectual level as catturd. If it's lying on the ground looking like a cat turd and stinking up the place I'm gonna call it a cat turd.
"I have learned to distinguish between the data and findings of studies and their recommendations, which are often influenced by outside forces"
Nah, if you didn't data and findings of the study you'd just say we can't "trust" the "system" blah blah blah.