Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Trevor's avatar

"This leads to a lot of pretty good books by women, but fewer great ones"

It's intriguing how often this pattern plays out: Men at the extreme ends of success and failure, with a higher proportion of woman in the middle of the curve. Men lead armies far more often than women, but get slaughtered at a higher rate. Men create world-shifting startups and sit on Fortune 500 boards at higher rates than women, but are also more likely to end up addicted to who knows what while living in a sidewalk tent.

How much is the absence of men in literature due to female takeover versus men just dropping out in favor of newer forms of entertainment like video games, social media, etc.?

Expand full comment
The Last Real Calvinist's avatar

Thanks for the Wodehouse post, Steve.

I'm a Wodehouse fan, and still read his novels. I find them ideal for airplane/holiday reading, and now that much of his work is out of copyright, you can load up the Kindle with Wodehouse as lavishly as you wish.

I know what you mean about his genre. I would go perhaps a little further, and say he's the best purely comic *novelist* I've read. Many comic authors are funny in stretches, but they overshoot, overwrite, and become a bit tiresome, especially at novel length.

Wodehouse is the master of finely-judged restraint. He manipulates a small range of settings, character types, and plot devices. He deals constantly with the absurd -- wonderfully, hilariously -- but he never surrenders to incongruous description or locution. Wodehouses's literary wineskins constantly bulge at the seams with sheer preposterous joy, but they burst only at rare -- and hence unforgettable -- apogees, e.g. Gussie Fink-Nottle's run at the school prize-giving ceremony. It's like an old-timey movie boiler with its gauges red-lined non-stop. No one else I've read can maintain this delicate balance.

Expand full comment
95 more comments...

No posts