Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Erik's avatar

One of the strange aspects of growing up GenX is that adult boomers would teach us about their childhoods as if it were history as important, formative and heroic as the revolutionary and civil war periods. In the late 70s/early 80s, from the reverent tones, I assumed Dylan was as dead as Hendrix. I was pleasantly shocked in the late 80s when he had a hit.

My parents were too old for rock and roll. The most contemporary they got was the folk craze (or the second folk craze, maybe the folk revival). The songs were simple, catchy and unlikely to offend the parents, but it doesn't make any sense to write new folk songs. Folk songs have to evolve over time based on audience response. They're like the Iliad; let the rhapsodes try out the stories in the small comedy clubs for a few centuries before you commit the final version to paper. So what were they writing, things that seemed like they could be folk songs? Things that had some of the characteristics of folk songs? Pre-folk songs?

Thus, in my mind, the folkies were as phony, if not more so, than the rockers. After a few years folk music was an obvious dead end for any creative.

Rock music, OTOH, far from being limited to the original Rock & Roll, was more the intersection between the revolution in electronic instruments and the rapidly expanding potential of analog tape studio production. Dylan would have been a fool to eschew the two great musical advancements of his lifetime.

Expand full comment
Matthew Wilder's avatar

Terrific piece. I recommend listening to Bob’s Nobel lecture, in which his Goodreads-esque dives into MOBY DICK, ALL QUIET ON THE WESTERN FRONT and THE ODYSSEY (download this speech, Christopher Nolan!) suggest that there is a lot more Harold Bloom than Jim Morrison inside Bob.

Expand full comment
28 more comments...

No posts