Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Nathan Bloom's avatar

It is something of an issue that there isn’t a strong, explicitly English identity in Americans of such extract. As the English have arguably been the most successful ethnic group in history, equal to or beside the Jewish people. I hope a certain level of ethnogenesis (or realization) spreads among the English diaspora.

Expand full comment
Bill Price's avatar

The overwhelmingly English character of middle America's white population is pretty clear if you look at just about any directory in your typical town or small city.

America is also much more Welsh than people realize: two Welsh surnames, Williams and Jones, make the top five US surnames.

I think the problem with the English ethnic thing is partly that it didn't really catch on in England itself until early modern times. England means "land of the Angles," but the Germans who settled mostly identified as Saxons, right? So it's kind of a misnomer.

The language we speak is a hybrid of Saxon, Norman French and a little Norse. The population is ethnically, for the most part, native British. Early Americans were well aware of all this: Benjamin Franklin even suggested we be careful about German immigration because our (British) forefathers made that mistake before.

I think it's pretty clear that colonial Americans weren't all that attached to English as an identity. We readily gave it up, and even the loyalists were more attached to the crown than they were to Mother England or any such 20th century type of nationalism.

I personally feel a kinship with English people, who are culturally not all that different from me, but despite having plenty of "English" ancestors, the English identity in the nationalist sense seems pretty foreign. In a sense, English and American ethnicity are not compatible precisely because we come from the same root stock. There must be some division to make our American identity meaningful.

Expand full comment
28 more comments...

No posts